Austria

Share this:
|
|
|

Basic Country Information

Region: Europe & North America
Income Group: High Income
Population: 9.18 million
GNI per Capita: 56833 USD
Urban population: 60% of total
Life expectancy at birth: 82 years
Human Development Index (HDI): 0.93

How does Austria control corruption?

Forecasted trend:

Stationary

	Integrity	Transparency
Country’s Score	7.67/10	14/20
World Rank	24/119	57/143
Regional Rank	19/33	28/33
Income group Rank	24/53	35/53

Index of Public Integrity

IPI Score: 7.67 / 10

The IPI score is the mean of the six components scores, which result from the standardization and normalization of original source data to range between 1 and 10 using a min-max-transformation, with higher values representing better performance.

Components	Component Score (max=10)	World Rank	Income Group Rank	Regional Rank
Opportunities for Corruption
Administrative Burden	0	/119	/53	/33
Trade Openness	0	/119	/53	/33
Administrative Transparency	7	31/119	21/53	19/33
Online Services	8.31	34/119	27/53	19/33
Budget Transparency	7.43	66/119	28/53	22/33
Constraints on Corruption
Judicial Independence	7.03	25/119	22/53	15/33
Freedom of the Press	8.24	20/119	20/53	18/33
E-Citizenship	8.02	32/119	32/53	26/33

Opportunities are permanent enabling circumstances for corruption. Empirical evidence exists that administrative discretion (lack of administrative transparency and poor regulation) combined with unaccountable resources (non-transparent public finance, both from domestic sources and international aid) create opportunities for corruption.

Constraints are permanent disabling circumstances of corruption. They encompass the legal response of authorities as well as the response by society (a free press and digitally enabled citizens organized as civil society or as individual voters).

Societies manage to control corruption if they find the right balance between opportunities and constraints.

Transparency in Austria

T-Index Score: 14 / 20 (20 = 100%)

Give us feedback
on our sources

T-Index

World
Average

Income Group
Average

Regional
Average

The total fulfillment of items on De Jure and De Facto adds up to 100%
on the basis of which we calculate the individual performance of a country

De Facto Transparency: 9 / 14

De Facto Components ↓ Live, online, and freely accessible sources of public data. These data sources were assessed as complete and freely available (1 point), partial and/or paid access (0.5 point), or missing (0 points).
Past expenditures (last fiscal year)	Yes
Current expenditures (budget tracker)	No
Public Procurement Portal	Yes
Land cadaster	Partial
Register of commerce	Partial
Auditor General's report	Yes
Supreme Court's hearings schedule	No
Supreme Court's rulings	Yes
Financial disclosures for public officials	Partial
Conflict of interest disclosures	Partial
Official Development Assistance (ODA)	Yes
Mining concessions	Yes
Building permits in the capital city	No
Official gazette	Yes

De Jure Transparency: 5 / 6

De Jure Components ↓ Formal transparency commitments by governments. Formal agreements that met category criteria (see Methodology) were assessed as existing (1 point) or not (0 points).
Freedom of Information Acts (FOIA)	Yes
Open Government Partnership (OGP)	No
United Nations Conventions Against Corruption (UNCAC)	Yes
Financial Action Task Force Against Money Laundering (or equivalent)	Yes
Plurinational transparency agreement (EITI, OECD, WTO GPA, or CPTPP)	Yes
Beneficial Ownership	Yes

Give us feedback on our sources
Please download our full dataset here
Note: Links last accessed in December 2024.

Austria's Corruption Forecast

Forecasted trend:

Stationary

Austria has regressed in the Index for Public Integrity and is underperforming in transparency compared to its income and regional peers. Although in the past the country managed to control corruption in spite of low transparency, the limits of past arrangements seem to have been reached. In recent years, a new generation of politicians broke integrity norms, but they were eventually brought to account for their actions. How the judiciary decides to finally deal with the most high-profile cases of corruption will be decisive to Austria’s future political integrity. To prevent further abuse of office like that seen in recent scandals, Austria needs more fiscal transparency, access to information and transparent monitoring of assets and interests of public officials. It also needs more transparency in both traditional and emerging media. The forecast is stationary.

Components	2015	2025	Trendline
Budget Transparency	7.43	7.43		0
Judicial Independence	7.26	7.03		0
Press Freedom	8.97	8.35		0
E-Citizenship	6.05	8.03		1
Online Services	8.48	8.31		0

positive change; negative change; change not statically significant.

For Budget Transparency, period considered is 2015-2019. For Judicial Independence, last value available is for 2019. For Press Freedom, period considered is 2007-2017. Due to insufficient data on Facebook users, E-citizenship was computed as the mean of the remaining two sub-indicators (fixed broadband subscriptions and Internet users).