Georgia

Basic Country Information

  • Region: Eastern Europe & Central Asia
  • Income Group: Upper Middle Income
  • Population: 3.67 million
  • GNI per Capita: 9194 USD
  • Urban population: 61% of total
  • Life expectancy at birth: 74 years
  • Human Development Index (HDI): 0.84

How does Georgia control corruption?

Forecasted trend:
Stationary
Integrity Transparency
Country’s Score 7.22/10 17/20
World Rank 39/119 17/143
Regional Rank 4/18 4/18
Income group Rank 6/37 6/37

Index of Public Integrity

IPI Score: 7.22 / 10
The IPI score is the mean of the six components scores, which result from the standardization and normalization of original source data to range between 1 and 10 using a min-max-transformation, with higher values representing better performance.
Components Component Score
(max=10)
World
Rank
Income Group
Rank
Regional
Rank
Opportunities for Corruption
Administrative Burden 0 /119 /37 /18
Trade Openness 0 /119 /37 /18
Administrative Transparency 10 1/119 1/37 1/18
Online Services 5.46 82/119 25/37 12/18
Budget Transparency 9.08 21/119 5/37 3/18
Constraints on Corruption
Judicial Independence 6.53 37/119 5/37 2/18
Freedom of the Press 4.82 79/119 19/37 8/18
E-Citizenship 7.4 43/119 4/37 5/18

Opportunities are permanent enabling circumstances for corruption. Empirical evidence exists that administrative discretion (lack of administrative transparency and poor regulation) combined with unaccountable resources (non-transparent public finance, both from domestic sources and international aid) create opportunities for corruption.

Constraints are permanent disabling circumstances of corruption. They encompass the legal response of authorities as well as the response by society (a free press and digitally enabled citizens organized as civil society or as individual voters).

Societies manage to control corruption if they find the right balance between opportunities and constraints.

Read more in the methodology.

 

 

For Budget Transparency, last value available is for 2019. For Online Services, last value available is for 2020. For Judicial Independence, last value available is for 2019. For the E-citizenship sub-components, last values available are also for 2020, and missing values in any of the sub-indicators were replaced with the latest available data point.

No IPI data for Georgia

Transparency in Georgia

T-Index Score: 17 / 20   (20 = 100%)
 
T-Index
 
 
World
Average
Income Group
Average
Regional
Average
The total fulfillment of items on De Jure and De Facto adds up to 100%
on the basis of which we calculate the individual performance of a country

De Facto Transparency: 12 / 14

De Facto Components
↓

Live, online, and freely accessible sources of public data.
These data sources were assessed as complete and freely available (1 point), partial and/or paid access (0.5 point), or missing (0 points).

Past expenditures (last fiscal year)
Yes
Current expenditures (budget tracker)
No
Public Procurement Portal
Yes
Land cadaster
Yes
Register of commerce
Yes
Auditor General's report
Yes
Supreme Court's hearings schedule
Yes
Supreme Court's rulings
Yes
Financial disclosures for public officials
Yes
Conflict of interest disclosures
Yes
Official Development Assistance (ODA)
No
Mining concessions
Yes
Building permits in the capital city
Yes
Official gazette
Yes

De Jure Transparency: 5 / 6

De Jure Components
↓

Formal transparency commitments by governments.
Formal agreements that met category criteria (see Methodology) were assessed as existing (1 point) or not (0 points).

Freedom of Information Acts (FOIA)
Yes
Open Government Partnership (OGP)
Yes
United Nations Conventions Against Corruption (UNCAC)
Yes
Financial Action Task Force Against Money Laundering (or equivalent)
Yes
Plurinational transparency agreement (EITI, OECD, WTO GPA, or CPTPP)
No
Beneficial Ownership
Yes

Give us feedback on our sources
Please download our full dataset here
Note: Links last accessed in December 2024.

No TI data for Georgia

Georgia's Corruption Forecast

Forecasted trend:
Stationary
Georgia has registered one of the most spectacular transitions to good governance in the second part of its post-communist transition, but its vicinity to Russia and its excessively contentious politics have prevented a complete accomplishment and even led to a recent backslide on online services. A textbook example of successful reforms under the presidency of Mikheil Saakashvili, with the reduction of administrative corruption opportunities and the introduction of merit-based reforms in the public sector, the country stopped short of judicial autonomy, broad press freedom and efficient oversight systems of government favoritism. The country has improved on digitally empowered citizens who demand good governance. While Georgia remains a nominal candidate for EU membership, the European influence has been so far insufficient to prevent the undue use of the judiciary for settling political scores, often in the pretext of corruption. Georgian officials have been sanctioned by the EU with loss of their EU visa free status in 2026 for their rule of law breach.
Components 2015 2025 Trendline
Budget Transparency 8.82 9.15 0
Judicial Independence 5.26 6.53 1
Press Freedom 7.4 5.15 -1
E-Citizenship 3.85 7.41 1
Online Services 6.57 5.46 0
  positive change;   negative change;   change not statically significant.

For Budget Transparency, period considered is 2008-2019. For Judicial Independence, last value available is for 2019. Due to insufficient data on Facebook users, E-citizenship was computed as the mean of the remaining two sub-indicators (fixed broadband subscriptions and Internet users).

No Forecast data for Georgia