Namibia

Share this:
|
|
|

Basic Country Information

Region: Sub-Saharan Africa
Income Group: Lower Middle Income
Population: 3.03 million
GNI per Capita: 4413 USD
Urban population: 56% of total
Life expectancy at birth: 67 years
Human Development Index (HDI): 0.67

How does Namibia control corruption?

Forecasted trend:

Stationary

	Integrity	Transparency
Country’s Score	5.28/10	8/20
World Rank	82/119	116/143
Regional Rank	6/31	21/31
Income group Rank	12/36	/36

Index of Public Integrity

IPI Score: 5.28 / 10

The IPI score is the mean of the six components scores, which result from the standardization and normalization of original source data to range between 1 and 10 using a min-max-transformation, with higher values representing better performance.

Components	Component Score (max=10)	World Rank	Income Group Rank	Regional Rank
Opportunities for Corruption
Administrative Burden	0	/119	/36	/31
Trade Openness	0	/119	/36	/31
Administrative Transparency	1	112/119	32/36	22/31
Online Services	4.78	89/119	18/36	9/31
Budget Transparency	7.86	62/119	11/36	9/31
Constraints on Corruption
Judicial Independence	6.12	41/119	4/36	5/31
Freedom of the Press	7.9	25/119	1/36	2/31
E-Citizenship	4	85/119	13/36	4/31

Opportunities are permanent enabling circumstances for corruption. Empirical evidence exists that administrative discretion (lack of administrative transparency and poor regulation) combined with unaccountable resources (non-transparent public finance, both from domestic sources and international aid) create opportunities for corruption.

Constraints are permanent disabling circumstances of corruption. They encompass the legal response of authorities as well as the response by society (a free press and digitally enabled citizens organized as civil society or as individual voters).

Societies manage to control corruption if they find the right balance between opportunities and constraints.

Transparency in Namibia

T-Index Score: 8 / 20 (20 = 100%)

Give us feedback
on our sources

T-Index

World
Average

Income Group
Average

Regional
Average

The total fulfillment of items on De Jure and De Facto adds up to 100%
on the basis of which we calculate the individual performance of a country

De Facto Transparency: 6 / 14

De Facto Components ↓ Live, online, and freely accessible sources of public data. These data sources were assessed as complete and freely available (1 point), partial and/or paid access (0.5 point), or missing (0 points).
Past expenditures (last fiscal year)	Partial
Current expenditures (budget tracker)	No
Public Procurement Portal	Yes
Land cadaster	No
Register of commerce	No
Auditor General's report	No
Supreme Court's hearings schedule	Yes
Supreme Court's rulings	Yes
Financial disclosures for public officials	No
Conflict of interest disclosures	No
Official Development Assistance (ODA)	Partial
Mining concessions	Yes
Building permits in the capital city	No
Official gazette	Yes

De Jure Transparency: 2 / 6

De Jure Components ↓ Formal transparency commitments by governments. Formal agreements that met category criteria (see Methodology) were assessed as existing (1 point) or not (0 points).
Freedom of Information Acts (FOIA)	No
Open Government Partnership (OGP)	No
United Nations Conventions Against Corruption (UNCAC)	Yes
Financial Action Task Force Against Money Laundering (or equivalent)	Yes
Plurinational transparency agreement (EITI, OECD, WTO GPA, or CPTPP)	No
Beneficial Ownership	No

Give us feedback on our sources
Please download our full dataset here
Note: Links last accessed in December 2024.

Namibia's Corruption Forecast

Forecasted trend:

Stationary

Despite a good human rights infrastructure, government favoritism is still widespread, and the domination of one party over almost three decades has become consolidated and is not seriously challenged by a press and a judiciary that otherwise work far better than the regional average. Major public data repositories for administrative transparency, like a land cadaster, a register of commerce, and a register of building permits are still missing. It is forecast to stagnate, as it had in the past ten years.

Components	2015	2025	Trendline
Budget Transparency	7.81	7.16		0
Judicial Independence	6.51	6.12		0
Press Freedom	8.67	8.03		0
E-Citizenship	2.29	4.01		1
Online Services	3.73	4.78		0

positive change; negative change; change not statically significant.

For Budget Transparency, period considered is 2008-2019. For Judicial Independence, last value available is for 2019. Due to insufficient data on Facebook users, E-citizenship was computed as the mean of the remaining two sub-indicators (fixed broadband subscriptions and Internet users). Missing values for 2020 in either of the sub-indicators were replaced with the latest available data point.